History Lessons Need More Than ‘Hitler & Henry’

The teaching of History is a critical part of children’s early experience. As such, this curriculum must be determined by education professionals who can bridge the gap between the stories of the past and the immediate background to our contemporary lives.
The turn of the year is an interesting time to look at History, and that’s just what some reports which came out last few weeks have done.
The Labour MP Gordon Marsden, a former History teacher, argues in a Fabian Society leaflet that the ‘Hitlerisation of History’ has resulted in disconnectivity, a lack of joined-up thinking in regard to our understanding of Britishness and of our European neighbours.
And now the Guardian reports that the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority has suggested ways in which teachers should cover the Hitler and post-World War II years in early secondary schooling, to support a more balanced view of 20th-century Germany.
Even History has a history
‘Until now,’, says the QCA, ‘an in-depth look at late 20th-century German history has not been a common focus of study …. As a result, there are few commercially produced classroom resources for many aspects of this study…’.
As a very active member in the mid- to late-1980s of the Forum of Academic and Teaching Associations in the Social Sciences (FACTASS) this revelation holds few suprises for me. At that time the (Conservative) Government was intent on removing almost every aspect of social, cultural and contemporary experience from the school curriculum.
One part of this intent was the ‘advice’ that History teaching was to stop at the end of World War II. There was on no account to be mention of the post-war period and the introduction, for instance, of the Welfare State.
The current lack of teaching about contemporary European affairs is probably an unintentional but directly connected result of this directive; for it became a cornerstone of the introduction of the National Curriculum.
Only connect
Of course there’s more to the content of History and other aspects of the modern curriculum than simply the input of unimaginative and short-sighted people who are antagonistic to parts of modern life. The QCA and Gordon Marsden are quite right to point to the need to turn History around to ensure it’s never again just meaningless lists of names and wars, of whatever era.
But in the end the only way we as citizens can obtain real insights into our modern-day lives is to know the full range of events and circumstances which lead up to the present day. That’s a task beyond any single discipline, historical or otherwise, but a complete and coherent History curriculum is a very good start.
Read more articles on Social Science

Posted on January 2, 2006, in Education, Health And Welfare, Politics, Policies And Process, Social Science. Bookmark the permalink. 1 Comment.

  1. “‘Who controls the past,’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.'” George Orwell, “1984.”
    “Those who tell the stories rule society.” Plato
    History is written by the victors…
    ‘Most people study from text books that are 10 years out of date’ Some Irish guy I met in a bar.
    While I do see the point of history lessons, I feel more emphasis should be spent on looking to the future, instead of dwelling on the past, which I myself spend far to much time doing.
    All the Lessons we could possibly learn from the past, should be learnt already!. Me – Johnvid.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: